“Tell me about your greatest weakness.”
It’s a meeting bomb that is fit for throwing off even the most prepared hopefuls and 90% of the time; it does.
At least, that is as per Melissa Llarena, a professional mentor who has put in 10 years helping experts effectively explore employment moves, craft convincing resumes—and expertly handle the “shortcoming” ask with elegance.
Want to know her secrets? We also wish for the same.
So we sat down with Llarena to take in more about what managers are attempting to gather by throwing out this inquiry and how to answer truthfully without uncovering an arrangement-breaking blemish.
LearnVest: Why do you think the “shortcoming” inquiry exhibits such an issue for job competitors or candidates?
Llarena: “When you’re in an interview, you’re being judged. There’s no more prominent evidence of that than when somebody approaches, for absence of a superior expression, ‘at last, is there any valid reason you shouldn’t land this position.’
That is truly what the shortcoming inquiry is attempting to tease out: What about you may not be the best fit, or why you may be a less secure contract than most others.
It is all that much an approach to channel the pool, and competitors would prefer not to say the wrong thing and get precluded.”
L.V. : Do enlisting directors always pose the question head-on or are there more subtle methods for sussing out a jobseeker’s blemishes?
Llarena : “A few interviewees have gotten to be pretty clever with regards to avoiding this inquiry, so HR had to find better approaches for revealing what they need to know—which is precisely how fruitful a given hire would be.
That, obviously, begins with a superior comprehension of the expenses they would acquire if they procured that individual.
For example, inquiries like, ‘What would your current director say are your greatest territories of change?’ and ‘What might you want to learn in this part?’ could be the employing chief’s endeavour to distinguish deficiencies.”
L.V.: So what may a clever response sound like?
Llarena: “A ton of time’s customers let me know they utilize bland answers like, ‘I’m a perfectionist!’ or ‘I’m only a sort-A man.’
In any case, the issue of these reactions is that they don’t sound remarkably accurate. It’s fundamentally saying you’re the ideal human—and there’s no such thing.
The best answer is to name a shortcoming that just applies to certain circumstances. For instance, you may say, ‘My anxiousness products up when fellow team members don’t convey on their guarantees, as it relates to mission-basic assignments with tight deadlines.’
At that point, the key is to complete that idea by recommending you’ve distinguished approaches to improve in those minutes later on.”
L.V.: – How about we say’s you have a skill gap. It is safe to say that it is sensible to offer this up as your shortcoming?
Llarena: “On the off chance that it’s something that is obviously clear from perusing your resume, for instance, you don’t have a certain certification then that is a totally reasonable shortcoming to rise, because it is likely to be on the top of brain for the interviewers.
That said made a point to combine the answer with something that is extremely valuable and convincing regarding your application, for example, what you’ve done, to date, which is like attaining a certification. Possibly you’ve as of now driven ventures with individuals who have the accreditation being referred to.
Fundamentally, you have to clarify what you’ve done to set yourself up for the occupation and why, in spite of your shortcoming, you’re still a decent contract, not a hazardous one.”
Also Read: The Unsaid Norms Of the Job Market
L.V.: Is there one thing you ought to never say?
Llarena: “Besides presenting an identity defect that you can’t get over, the most exceedingly terrible thing you could say is nothing—either by saying you don’t have a clue, or that you don’t have a shortcoming. Both situations are terrible.
It’s immature to say you don’t have an area that you could enhance. Each has something. Proposing overall simply demonstrates an absence of preparation.